>> Yes. The stories of Genesis could not have possibly happened.
Macro evolution conflicts with the Creation account, and Noah's ark couldn't have possibly happened.
Click here for What are the arguments for macro evolution?
< STRONG Macro evolution isn't proven and Noah's Ark might have actually happened.
Click here for What are the arguments against macro Evolution?
Click here for Why should we Believe in the Noah’s Ark account?
Click here for What Evidence is there for/against the worldwide flood and Noah’s Ark account?
<STRONG No. The author's intent suggest some literal interpretations for Genesis.
The fact that genealogies are included in Genesis suggest serious interpretation. The Genesis genealogy is later connected with Jesus in the gospels. The gospels' genealogies literally connects Jesus, the Messiah, to King David, to Noah, and finally to Adam and Eve. There is some serious intent in mapping such a line.
The author of Noah's ark included extra details to suggest literal interpretation. The author also says for example:
Gen 9:19: These three were the sons of Noah, and from these the people of the whole earth were dispersed.
This statement alone is making a serious claim and it would sound ridiculous to say that it should be taken as a metaphor or for poetic value. If so, a metaphor for what? Power? Dominion? There's nothing to represent! Saying it is a metaphor seems to insult it.
Click here for more details: Why should we Believe in the Noah’s Ark account?
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
No flaming.
No trolling.
No lewd or offensive content.
No swearing or crude language.
Moderators have the right to delete comments to keep the commenting section clean. However, we will try to not use this right as much as possible, so please feel free to comment while following the rules.
All comments on arguments, counter arguments, and views and opinions of the page are welcome, so long not offensive. You can express disagreement without being offensive.